Asset Division Of Inheritances & Trusts In Divorce: Connecticut Vs. New York

Last updated on July 1, 2025

Many people assume that inherited assets are always considered separate property, immune from division during a divorce. However, this is not always the case. The law’s treatment of inheritances can vary on several factors, including how a spouse manages the assets during marriage and the specific laws of the state where the divorce occurred. Whether you are in Connecticut or New York, understanding how divorce will impact your inheritance is crucial to safeguarding your assets.

While both states follow equitable distribution principles, there are subtle differences in how they approach inherited property. With over 30 years of experience in family law, our Stamford team at The Prince Law Group, LLC, can help you understand these nuances, which can significantly affect the outcome of your property division case.

Key Considerations When Negotiating Asset Division Agreement

While the law often categorizes inheritances as separate property, certain actions can transform them into marital property, subject to division during divorce. When inherited assets are mixed with marital funds or used for joint purposes, they may lose their separate status. For instance, if you deposit inheritance money into a shared bank account that both you and your spouse use, the court could view it as marital property. Similarly, using your inheritance to pay for marital assets can change their status. If you use your inherited funds to renovate the family home or purchase a car that both you and your spouse use, these assets will be part of the marital estate during asset division.

Given the complexities surrounding inheritances in divorce, working with a knowledgeable inheritance divorce lawyer is essential. They can analyze the specifics of your case and help you work toward a fair outcome in your divorce proceedings.

Commingling And Transmutation Of Inherited Assets

Commingling of assets refers to the mixing of separate property, such as an inheritance or trust distributions, with marital property. This blending can cause even an originally protected asset to become subject to equitable distribution in divorce.

In both New York and Connecticut, courts examine how the asset was used and whether the owner demonstrated an intent to share it with their spouse.

Examples of commingling of assets include:

• Using inherited funds to pay down the mortgage on a jointly titled home
• Depositing money from a trust into a shared account used for everyday marital expenses
• Purchasing a joint vehicle or funding a vacation home in both spouses names using inherited or trust funds

In these scenarios, inheritances and trusts in divorce can become part of the divisible marital estate. Courts may presume that the party who received the asset intended to convert this separate property into marital property, especially if the recipient fails to maintain detailed financial records or treat the asset as distinctly theirs.

New York tends to require clear evidence of donative intent, such as adding a spouse’s name to an account or co-signing on a property purchase. Connecticut takes a broader approach: as an “all property” state, it allows judges to consider any property, regardless of its origin, if doing so supports a fair outcome.

Transmutation of property occurs when a spouse legally or functionally changes the character of separate property through actions such as:

• Adding the other spouse’s name to the title
• Using inherited funds for joint investments or real estate
• Routinely referring to inherited property as marital

Connecticut courts assess the totality of circumstances, including the couple’s financial interdependence and length of marriage. New York may still protect the asset if there is no clear intent to gift it to the marriage.

To help prevent commingling of assets or transmutation of property, inherited funds should be kept in individual accounts and not used for shared purposes. Using a prenuptial agreement or postnuptial agreement can also help define how inheritances and trusts in divorce should be treated.

The Treatment Of Trusts In Divorce

A trust is a fiduciary arrangement in which a grantor transfers property to a trustee, who manages it for the benefit of a beneficiary. Trusts vary significantly in how they are treated in divorce, depending on their structure, intent and how they are used during the marriage.

New York and Connecticut courts analyze several factors when determining whether a trust is subject to division. One of the first considerations is whether the trust is a revocable trust or an irrevocable trust.

A revocable trust allows the grantor to make changes or dissolve the trust entirely. Because the grantor maintains control, courts often consider the assets in a revocable trust fair game in equitable distribution, especially if the trust was created during the marriage or funded with marital property.

An irrevocable trust created by a third party for one spouse’s benefit often remains protected. However, if the beneficiary receives regular distributions or uses trust assets to fund the marital lifestyle, courts may factor those funds into decisions about equitable distribution.

When a spouse creates a trust during the marriage using marital property, it is more likely to be treated as part of the divisible estate. This is a particular risk if both spouses benefit or if the grantor maintains access or control.

Courts may also examine whether the trustee has discretion. A judge generally cannot force a trustee to make distributions unless they are mandated by the trust’s terms. However, a spouse’s access to distributions may still impact financial outcomes in divorce.

It is worth noting that New York courts are typically more likely to exclude third-party-created irrevocable trusts from marital division. Connecticut courts retain greater latitude due to their broad discretion under “all property” principles. Even when the trust itself is not divided, its economic benefits may be reflected in other aspects of the financial settlement.

Because trust law intersects with divorce law in nuanced ways, parties should seek legal guidance to help ensure their interests are protected. Proper planning through an irrevocable trust or clearly excluding a trust from division in a prenuptial agreement or postnuptial agreement may help shield assets from division and future disputes.

Inheritance And Divorce In Connecticut

Courts in Connecticut follow the equitable distribution principle when dividing the marital estate. This means that each spouse will receive a fair and equitable share of their joint assets, although this does not necessarily mean a 50/50 split.

The law generally considers inheritances to be separate property, but this protection is not absolute if the inheritance has commingled with shared assets.

Clear documentation is crucial to safeguarding individual property. We recommend keeping detailed records of inherited assets. This can help prevent your inheritance from being included in the marital estate during divorce proceedings.

Inheritance And Divorce In New York

Like Connecticut, New York is an equitable distribution state, prioritizing fairness over equal division in divorce proceedings. Courts also view inheritances as separate property unless you have mixed them with marital assets.

To protect your inheritance in New York, keeping it separate from joint accounts and marital expenses is crucial. Prenuptial agreements can provide extra protection by clearly defining inherited assets as separate property. Proper documentation and clear financial boundaries can also help preserve the separate nature of inherited assets. If you find yourself facing a divorce with your inheritances on the line, you need a property division lawyer on your side. They can help you develop asset division strategies to protect your rights and financial landscape.

FAQ: Inheritances In Connecticut And New York Divorce

Understanding the legal treatment of inheritances and trusts in divorce can help you make informed financial decisions before and during marriage. Below are answers to frequently asked questions about how courts in New York and Connecticut may address inheritances in divorce proceedings.

What is the difference in NY and CT if the inheritance was received before vs. during the marriage?

In both New York and Connecticut, an inheritance received before marriage generally qualifies as separate property. However, the timing alone does not guarantee protection. If the asset was used in a way that benefited both spouses – such as contributing to the family home or being placed in a shared account – it may be subject to commingling of assets or transmutation of property, potentially converting it into marital property.

Does it matter if my spouse’s name is also on the inherited asset?

Yes. Titling inherited property in both spouses’ names is one of the most common ways separate property becomes marital property. For instance, adding your spouse to the deed of an inherited home or to a bank account containing inherited funds may be seen as intent to share ownership. In both New York and Connecticut, this action may trigger equitable distribution, even if the original asset was clearly inherited.

Under what circumstances can a spouse make a claim against an inheritance in a divorce?

A spouse may have this right if the inherited property was used for joint purposes, enhanced with marital property or integrated into the couple’s financial life.

Connecticut judges have broad discretion and may include separate property in asset division if necessary for fairness. In New York, a spouse might be entitled to a share of the asset’s increased value if that growth resulted from marital efforts or expenditures. This often happens in divorces involving businesses, real estate or trust distributions used for mutual benefit.

Seek Trusted Advice For Your Asset Division Needs

We are here to provide personalized legal strategies. Do not hesitate to contact our office at 203-653-8483 or reach out to us using our online form. Let us work together to protect what is rightfully yours.